-Gila Region Community News, Calendar, Forum-

Reader Supported Silver City News & SW New Mexico, Grant County NM, Gila NF
* Login   * Register

* FAQ    * Search

All times are UTC - 7 hours

News     Columns     Food: Growing, Fixing     Features     Water     Health     Business     Education     DIY & How-tos     Classifieds     Forum     Home 

Silver City Food Coop

We Are Reader Supported
Your recurring contribution goes to support the Forum, Calendar, and Email List, which exists to further local, sustainable, place-based community.
    Bill Me Now For: $

Bill Me Now For: $

You may also mail a check or cash to
Moses Clark
PO Box 1792
Silver City, N.M. 88062

Get your ad here

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author ------ Message
 Author: streamdynamics
PostPosted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 5:52 pm 
Imagine a cup of water filled from the tap and brought to your lips only to realize that your glass is empty. Water is so very vital to life, humans and otherwise, that a reliant species without access to it, or to clean supplies of it, would simply crash, no question about it. Water is so vital, but so scarce though it may not seem that way to us. All we have to do is look at a diagram of the Earth’s supply of water to notice that there is not very much available to humans.

I have recently been fighting a diversion of the Gila River here in southwest New Mexico. People ask me why it is so critical to preserve the river. They argue that humans need water and I want to yell at them: Exactly! Here’s how it works: You divert water from a stream or river and the ecosystem and wetlands (which are nature’s purification systems) are degraded to a level where they disappear or no longer support a river system. This creates a situation that is unsustainable because after you degrade the wetlands and stream health, you may be getting a temporary flood of drinking water but because you destroyed the watershed, you will have no water in the future. You are thwarting nature so cleverly only to be rewarded with a system beyond our petty human control that collapses in on itself and us.

Nature is often taken for granted and we don’t realize how much nature gives us. If we let it, Nature could purify a life’s supply of clean water. Instead we work against it and end up stymied. To look at it from an economist’s point of view, Nature is an asset, a tool that we can work with for our own needs if we only took the time to understand the ecosystems we have been swallowing up.
Take for example New York in 1997 and its decision about how to purify its water. During the time preceding this decision, NYC was receiving its water from the mountain watersheds in upstate New York, namely the Catskill/Delaware watershed. The water was purified through the wetlands and filtered by the roots of cattail and any excess nutrients received through fertilizer or agriculture were absorbed by flourishing plants. However, as development increased around the watersheds, contaminants began to appear in the waterways. Leaking sewage, pollution from forestry and agriculture, and manure from farms tainted the once pristine NYC tap.

As the once clean water was affected by the relentless development, a cry for action, mainly by the EPA and the commandments of the Safe Drinking Water Act, was instated. New York faced a decision to either invest $6-$8 billion, plus yearly maintenance expenses amounting to $300-$500 million, in an artificial water purification plant OR, and this was a daring idea, spend $1.5 billion on a project to protect the upstate watersheds, that is form buffer zones and protect riparian areas as well as control contaminate amount, where NYC, and most of the state, got its naturally purified water. NY state chose the natural option and began to go about the process of protecting the watersheds that quenched their thirst. Of course, this plan was not smoothly implemented without controversy. Many developers exclaimed that this plan would hurt the economy by prohibiting new property to be developed and new land to be cultivated. Still though, this plan was an enormous success as far as the idea that nature could be an asset goes. But, work does not stop there. I recently heard of a tentative plan to frack in the Catskills and I see how far we have to go.

We want to protect water so we need to protect the zones it inhabits. This is only valid if we slow our growth. For the future of our world, we need to slow growth and switch to renewable energy. We need to revolutionize our current system by huge proportions. In relation to water quality, growth prohibits protection of watersheds because growth is blind. Growth does not care if children die from contaminated water or if species and species of birds go extinct. We can't drink from our rivers at this point, they're just too important. We can lobby in Congress all we want, but in order to do what New York did on a large, every day, viable scale we need to stop our growth and find a system that can support water, which is in serious danger of being poisoned, poisoned by growth. But it won’t be easy to change the consensus of the people and more ominously, the corporations. We need to convince people of the wealth of natural land.

A quote from Orion Magazine puts it this way:
“…Typically, the property owners - whether individuals, corporations, governments, or other institutions - are not compensated for the services the natural assets on their land provide to society. With rare exception, owners of coastal wetlands are not paid for the abundance of seafood the wetlands nurture, nor are owners of tropical forests compensated for that ecosystem’s contribution to the pharmaceutical industry and climate stability. As a result, many crucial types of ecosystem capital are undergoing rapid degradation and depletion. Compounding the problem is that the importance of ecosystem services is often widely appreciated only upon their loss.”
Gretchen C. Daily and Katherine Ellison “The New Economy of Nature”, Orion Magazine Spring 2002

Really, the only viable plan is to slow growth because growth in and of itself will make it impossible for planet Earth to sustain us. I have utmost faith that Mother Nature will continue on, plodding through natural selection after natural selection, ice age after tropical oasis shaping a planet out of what it has, as this Earth has always done in the past. Humans are only a minuscule experiment in Nature’s formula for constant change. The Earth will find a way to plod on even through the crude oil sludge that might someday coat our land, but for our own selfish existence, and the existence of our fellow species at this time, we are seriously on the path to mess things up. We our hurling ourselves like suicidal beings against the Earth. We are screwing up our own lives.

But there is still a chance. There is a small space of time to turn ourselves around and try to slow the gears of the machine that is growth and the utter destruction of the planet by mankind. When humankind falls, it won't be a massacre and it won't be apocalyptic-like, with zombies chopping off our heads. It will be the wipe out of our resources, our natural resources. It will be our space overcome by human population crowding out our own selves; it will be food no longer available because all our croplands and forests will have been destroyed; it will be our water, poisoned and diverted until all of it is not accessible or not drinkable. Water is so very vital, I cannot stress this enough. When our hunter/gatherer ancestors ran out of food they knew they had to forage some and move with the animals on migration, but when your water runs out, well, you're in trouble. We can survive 2-3 weeks without food. We can survive a couple days without water.

Water is so special on this planet. It always moves, giving way for more water. It sinks and it spreads. It can dissolve compounds into it, sometimes without a hint to mankind. These attributes make water special and able to sustain organisms, but they also tell a grim fate for those of us who have thwarted the water. When we have piped out all the water from rivers and lakes and the glaciers have melted into the sea, our wetlands will shrivel up and our water will never be clean. When we have contaminated the water, those contaminates, dissolved into the water, will spread and sink into our groundwater, which will be so far deep in the ground from our efforts to unearth we will not be able to reach it.

But I said there was a chance. There is, at least I believe so, if we can look at watersheds as preservers of the peace, as filterers of the water, and as assets to us. Keeping a healthy watershed is bogus without limiting our growth and becoming more sustainable in other ways, just as this limiting and sustainability is impossible bogus without a healthy watershed. The decision in New York to preserve the Catskill/Delaware watershed was small but we can observe the positive repercussions it had. Environmentally, it preserved the wetlands and the animals that live there. This was good for humans, as a selfish species, because it allowed the New Yorkers to get clean drinking water. Economically, it cost way less than the water treatment infrastructure for water that was already coming to NY through the mountains (and could be properly filtered in the mountains). Socially, it was good as well. Humans are all about selfish needs, so this plan is appealing to those needs, because, dear humans, your society will not exist without healthy water. Your society will be sick without clean water. Your social sustainability will be of naught. There will not be a human society after a dozen more decades of water mistreatment.

Though it may be hard to transition to a sustainable lifestyle of limited growth and renewable resources, it's almost mandatory if we want to continue on this planet for a little while longer and leave this good Earth alive, after we our gone.

Now I ask the people who want to divert the Gila River, it is worth the water?

--Ella Kirk, Stream Dynamics Inc.

Last edited by streamdynamics on Sat Sep 14, 2013 5:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

 Author: ynotwrite2
PostPosted: Sat Sep 07, 2013 10:50 am 
"Keeping a healthy watershed is bogus without limiting our growth and becoming more sustainable in other ways, just as this limiting and sustainability is impossible bogus without a healthy watershed. The decision in New York to preserve the Catskill/Delaware watershed was small....."
perhaps you are correct.
in New York State, New York City is politically and economically the gorilla in the room. how else do you think it was able to set aside its drinking and flushing watershed, safe from country estates and subdivisions?
look at the demographics of New Mexico: the Rio Grande valley has well above half of the state's 2+ million people......and if there's not a few wet years soon... they will come looking for more any way they can.
in 1974 the Town of Silver City had outgrown its wastewater plant and was planning a new, larger one. one of my friends and i went to the council meeting where an Albuquerque engineering firm was to discuss its proposal for the usual energy intensive waste processing solution: steel, concrete, pumps and motors. we presented an alternative solution of constructed wetlands that would have only needed enough electricity to raise the effluent to the elevation of the beds, as little as a tenth what the engineered solution required. history shows the result. a part of me would like to scribble on the back of the envelope and give you a number to ponder. as you say in your article, the problem of our species, the biosphere, and physical limits.....

 Author: patriceontheroad
PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 4:39 pm 
I've decided to resurrect these for any not aware that these were written by Ella Jaz Kirk when she was working with Stream Dynamics. If you use the material for anything, please credit ella, and the community board and Van Clothier of Stream Dynamics for giving her a chance to find her voice.

I miss my daughter and friend, but I enjoy still the words she wrote and the lessons she taught me.

If you are so inclined, a memorial fund has been set up in her name. Monies raised will be used to protect the Gila and teach children about its intrinsic value and beauty. You can find it at gilaconservation.org


 Author: MineralMama
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 6:42 am 
Thank you, Patrice, for sharing not only your daughter's heart felt concerns for the rest of us here on earth, but also a humble applause for Van Clothier of Stream Dynamics for being such a wonderful mentor to Ella. I strongly believe these words will have great, positive impact and eventually reach beyond the Gila River.

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 7 hours

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:

Gila River Festival Ad

Silver City & Southwestern New Mexico Monthly Community Calendar

Click To Create A New Calendar Event

Community Events
Week of May 27, 2019



News     Columns     Food: Growing, Fixing     Features     Water     Health     Business     Education     DIY & How-tos     Classifieds     Forum     Home 
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group